Site Selection magazine
twitter linkedIn facebook email email email
A Site Selection Web Exclusive, July 2016
WEB Exclusive story

Brexit Implications for Corporate Location Decision-Making: A View from London


On 24th of June, the British people voted to leave the European Union after a referendum organized by former Prime Minister David Cameron. This was prompted in a political context marked by the rise of the far right party UKIP, a Euro-skeptic party whose chair, Nigel Farage, was Member of the European Parliament for South East England since 1999, and the discontent of David Cameron’s conservative back benchers. In January 2013, he therefore announced the decision to hold a referendum.

Today, it is clear that the leaders of the Exit campaign had no plan, and were indeed surprised to win — Nigel Farage resigned on 4th July; Boris Johnson, former Mayor of London, pulled out from the race to become Prime Minister; and Michael Gove lost to Theresa May due to lack of support from MPs. (Johnson on July 13th was named by May to be her foreign secretary. — Editors)

The UK, by being in the European Union, benefited from free trade and free movement across Europe, essentially allowing UK-based companies to reach out to a population of 500 million customers. For that reason, London, and the UK were the location of choice for North American, Indian and Chinese companies, using the country as a gateway to Europe.

In 2015, the UK remained the main recipient of global FDI in Europe, achieving record figures boosted by most English regions, which saw significant increases in project numbers, and Scotland enjoying its best year on record. The country attracted 1,065 FDI projects (up 20 percent over 2014) and created over 42,000 jobs.
Source: EY’s EIM annual report - EY’s attractiveness survey UK 2016 Positive rebalancing?

The economy had recovered from 2008/2009, with the UK’s GDP growing faster than that of France and Germany, at 2.9 percent in 2014 and 2.3 percent in 2015 (up from -4.2% in 2009), compared to 0.3 percent in 2014 and 1.2 percent in 2015 in France, and 1.6 percent and 1.7 percent in Germany.
Source: World Bank

What will be the impact of this decision on Foreign Direct Investment flows to the UK?

Policies will for sure be put in place by the British government to ensure that the UK remains attractive to foreign investors and therefore maintains its competitive position in Europe. Before leaving his post as Chancellor of the Exchequer (Finance Minister), George Osbourne suggested that corporate taxes on profits could be lowered to 15 percent.

With a population of 65 million, the UK market remains an attractive proposition to foreign investors. Although the type of investments may change (European HQs may no longer be an option), UK regions must target sectors and companies in need of a local presence.

It is likely that the deal agreed with the EU will provide a similar access to the Single Market as now, but with restrictions on the free movement of people. This would enable the UK to remain a key recipient of foreign direct investment given its existing business-friendly environment, which may even be improved by the new Government.

Of course, nothing is guaranteed and is subject to the attitude of other EU countries.

Jean-Noël Mermet
Leslie Venon

Jean-Noël Mermet is managing director of London-based global consultancy Frenger International Ltd.
Leslie Venon is head of FDI Research & Strategy | Consulting Services for Frenger International Ltd.


Site Selection online is a worldwide service of Conway Data, Inc. ©1983-2024, all rights reserved. Data is from many sources and not warranted to be accurate or current. To unsubscribe from our print magazine, contact Julie Clarke. For general inquiries, visit our contact page. For technical inquiries contact the Webmaster.