Site Selection magazine
twitter linkedIn facebook email email email
TRANSLATE: 
TRUSTBELT
A Site Selection Web Exclusive, June 2019
SHARE THIS ON SOCIAL MEDIA

The Collaboration Score: Why Site Selectors Should Use It

Surprise, Arizona, is one community that gets high marks on the Collaboration Index, according to site consultant Leslie Wagner of Ginovus.
Photo courtesy of City of Surprise

by LESLIE WAGNER, Senior Principal for Ginovus

The next time you conduct a site search for the optimal location for a business operation, consider adding the “collaboration score” of each community to your matrix.

Location modeling and real estate site selection is a process companies may undertake either through the use of internal resources or by outsourcing the task to a company that specializes in the field. A qualified site selection professional or firm will apply a methodical approach to the process in order to evaluate all factors that are important to a location decision and ultimately reach a conclusion about which site will best serve the needs of the company.

One approach is to construct a matrix built upon analyzing key factors that make a site suitable for business growth. To account for the relative importance of these factors, they can be ranked and weighted to determine the comparative strength of one location to another. A typical approach might include the evaluation of standard factors such as human capital, business climate, quality of life and infrastructure availability.

These factors, while not comprehensive for all projects, are quantifiable and can be ranked. Through various methods of comparison, these ranks can then be used to translate large amounts of data into values that are easy to interpret and consider in the decision-making process. As an example, in the chart below, data in each category has been ranked resulting in comparable scores that are then color coded, green indicating higher/better scores, red lower scores to highlight the best site in each category and overall. This can be used as the basis for justifying on a quantifiable basis a site selection decision. 

Chart

What may be missing from this approach but should absolutely be a consideration in the site selection process, is the community “collaboration score.” Though less defined and more qualitative in nature, a collaboration score is the measure of the extent to which the community is fully aligned with its economic development strategies and efforts. In other words, a highly collaborative community would be one which has an agreed-upon and holistic approach to business attraction and retention. All agencies, public and private, that will be involved in the successful outcome of the project are in sync and understand the project objectives.

As a general rule, communities and regions have economic development professionals and entities tasked with promoting the assets of the area. These are made up of individuals that serve as the community’s front line for economic development projects and whose primary function is to create jobs, increase the tax base and improve the quality of life of community residents. In a collaborative community, these professionals are seasoned, fully willing and capable of promoting and “selling” the assets of their region and are able to navigate projects with the vision of successfully winning or keeping the business. This front-line approach works extremely well when the community and its stakeholders are fully aligned with respect to business attraction strategies and are committed to working collaboratively with the prospective company and its representatives to ensure the project comes to fruition.

The challenge and true risk to the site selection process is the realization, sometimes too late in the game, that a community is not well aligned, that they do not work collaboratively, or worse, that the community is divided and at odds with their approach to business attraction and economic development strategies. Site selection decision-makers, whether internal or external to the company, seeking a new location should beware, as this non-collaborative spirit within a community and its leadership can have devastating short- and long-term impacts on a project. Negative results such as delayed operational timelines, increased project costs, and compromised objectives can occur as a result.

Wagner
Leslie Wagner

Having been in the site selection business for 17-plus years, our firm has observed and navigated projects within both types of communities. We have seen strong job creation and investment projects that are focused on a particular site shift focus quickly when it became apparent that there was a lack of cohesion among community stakeholders. Once confidence in project success is shaken and it becomes known that the collaboration score is low, our recommendation, and the general instincts of those clients that we represent, is to move on to the next available site being considered as a way to mitigate risk and increase the likelihood of success.

How can a community’s true collaboration score be known before a project moves too far down the road? As a firm, our practice is to constantly do our homework at the state, regional and local levels. Reading local publications, reviewing council and commission meeting minutes, attending schoolboard meetings and interacting with the regional economic development professionals can all be very telling sources for how those involved in the process interact, support and treat new and existing business growth opportunities. Of particular interest is understanding the level of collaboration in securing economic development incentives that have a meaningful financial impact by offsetting project costs.

State and local Incentive tools are often available to companies that are competitively evaluating where to locate new investment and create new quality jobs. If such tools are available to support a project, understanding the administrative and approval processes and the “collaboration score” for those entities involved in project review and approvals becomes vitally important. If a project were to move forward with reliance on the value of a particular incentive benefit, such as real estate tax expense offset, only to learn that those responsible for approving are not in favor of utilizing the incentive tool as a means to attract investment, that could result in a devastating financial impact for the company. 

In contrast, communities that work together and are successful at instilling confidence will score high on the collaboration meter. Confidence that there are no hidden agendas, that all requests will be handled with the utmost professionalism, and when, not if, problems arise, that they will be worked through in a positive manner and within efficient timelines is paramount to a successful project.

Site selectors, both internal and external, should be in the practice of seeking out those communities that assist the location process by moving forward in a timely manner, with minimal delays in approval processes, so long as the company is doing its part. Our experience indicates that businesses are much more willing to invest for the long term and grow in a community that demonstrates it can work together, is financially stable and has strong community leadership.

With a strong collaboration score evidenced by these practices and priorities, along with great communication and total transparency, all involved can have peace of mind that the project will result in success.


The TrustBelt report helps the US Midwest tell its economic resurgence story to the audience of Site Selection. The TrustBelt report serves as a comprehensive repository of news and analysis on corporate real estate and economic development activity throughout the Midwest. This includes content on every state in the region — Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri and Northern Kentucky, along with Western New York and Pennsylvania.



Site Selection online is a worldwide service of Conway, Inc. ©1983-2019, all rights reserved.
Data is from many sources and not warranted to be accurate or current.
To unsubscribe from our print magazine, contact Julie Clarke. For general inquiries, visit our contact page.
For technical inquiries contact the Webmaster.
HOME | SITE SELECTION MAGAZINE ARCHIVES | SUBSCRIBE | PRIVACY POLICY