Click to visit Site Selection Online
SEPTEMBER 2005

Click to visit www.sitenet.com
SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION
BIOTECH LOCATION STRATEGIES



The Region Must Be
Known to Venture Capitalists

    There's no disagreement among the experts that access to venture capital is one of the top concerns on any biotech company's agenda. How close the VCs need to be to a specific region is debatable in a world where funding can come from anywhere, says Lewis.
      "Historically, it's been nice to be within a few hours drive of your capital, but what's more critical is being known to the VC community," he says. "We see companies selecting a location based on the cost of living being lowest, not on the presence of a VC community. And we see VCs located in the Silicon Valley urging companies to stay in Ohio (because of the cost of living)."
      Awan argues that while access to capital is extremely critical for companies, that doesn't mean a company must reside in a region with a high concentration of VC firms. "We've had folks from the West Coast invest in western Massachusetts companies and folks from here go to Texas. You can always host VCs and showcase your products."
      Grace believes biotech firms want to see "foreign" investment in a region, which is usually attracted
Mahmud Awan, RTC
to a domestic pool of capital.
      "That's where the government comes in. Site selectors need to look for national and provincial governments that recognize the need for seed capital to leverage larger VC firms," he says.
      Bankofier agrees, pointing out that the Arizona legislature in May passed a bill that allows "angels" to receive a 35-percent tax credit for life science investments for each dollar up to $250,000 that they invest in early-stage biotechnology.


Cost of Doing Business Could
Be 'Make It or Break It' Point
      There's no away around it: The cost of doing business can pretty much trump many of the benefits a region has to offer, these experts agree.
      Whether it's energy costs, real estate or the cost of industry R&D, Grace argues that lower is better because it means a higher profit margin for the company and more bang for the buck for employees. Regions with lower housing costs, for example, can lower their employee salary level while still providing a high quality of life.
      Although he calls the cost of living "the most critical thing," Awan warns site selectors to be careful when assessing a region's cost of living. "They need to balance the growth aspects of a location, as in how it lends itself to grow the business and improve profitability, with issues like weather that affect energy costs. Then those issues need to be balanced against factors that relate to creativity. A place that's more costly at first glance may have other benefits. The Northeast, for example, may have higher operating costs, but also have other benefits — like proximity to funding sources and a high number of research institutions — that balance the picture."
      He adds that site selectors need to "look for a winning combination. A huge, pre-existing cluster of biotech firms will usually mean a very high cost of living. You have to pay employees twice as much in Cambridge, Mass., or Palo Alto, Calif. But move 75 miles away to a place like western Massachusetts and the costs go down and employees salaries drop."
      All advise site selectors to seek regions where state governments are providing a supportive tax structure that can level the playing field. For example, Massachusetts -- once known as "laxachusetts" — now has a state government that is "tremendously responsive and aware of business challenges," says Awan.
      In Arizona, Bankofier says his tech council is currently pushing legislation that will give companies an added 10 percent tax credit for collaborative research with the four main universities. This is coming on the heels of $440 million for universities to build and improve existing R&D facilities.

TOP OF PAGE


Next Page


©2005 Conway Data, Inc. All rights reserved. SiteNet data is from many sources and not warranted to be accurate or current.