If you had to get an urgent message to someone living 90,000 years in the future, how would you do it? Would language suffice? Would images even do the trick, or might they be viewed as crude, primitive pictograms?
That’s just one of the challenges facing Onkalo, the world’s first permanent nuclear waste repository, whose name translates from the Finnish into “hiding place.” The €3.3-billion (US$3.6-billion) project in November received approval of its construction license from the Finnish government.
“Finland’s parliamentary decision confirms the commitment to a world leading nuclear waste management program. It also says something about the values of this Nordic state which other nuclear powered countries will now keenly observe,” said Fionán O’Carroll, project manager for international operations at Saanio & Riekkola (S&R), which contributed expertise to the application.
“This pioneering project is important not only for Finland, but also on a global scale. It is the first project entering into construction phase in the whole world.”
Onkala is located on the island of Olkiluoto in Eurajoki on Finland’s western coast, about 300 km. (187 miles) northwest of Helsinki, and just down the road from the nuclear power complex operated by Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) and Fortum Power and Heat Oy.
Those companies are now pursuing the construction of a third nuclear unit at that site, expected to be complete in 2018. (A planned fourth unit was canceled due to the delays experienced with the third.) More than 4,000 people from 55 different countries are working at the site.
At the Onkalo site next door, final disposal into Finnish bedrock of the spent fuel generated by the Olkiluoto and Loviisa nuclear power plants operated by those firms is planned to begin in the early 2020s. Posiva, jointly owned by TVO and Fortum, is in charge of R&D work regarding the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel, as well as the construction and operation of the encapsulation plant and disposal facility.
Putting the on-hold Yucca Mountain repository in the United States into perspective, Posiva personnel have been working on Finland’s spent nuclear fuel storage solution for 40 years. The Finnish Parliament approved the decision-in-principle on the final disposal project in 2001. Posiva submitted the application for the construction license at the end of 2012. No one active on the project will see it through to its final backfilling, closure and decommissioning, which is expected to take place in the early 2120s.
But the time spans of this project go well beyond that. Nuclear waste stays dangerously radioactive or radiotoxic for 100,000 years. To keep future earthlings from stumbling on the structure and thinking they’ve uncovered a treasure from the past, communication must be formulated whose meaning will be understood tens of thousands of human half-lives from now.
“Scientific studies have been conducted in relation to nuclear waste storages,” notes Michael Madsen, the maker of a documentary about the project titled “Into Eternity,” “but the studies were ended as the US Academy of Science deemed it impossible to secure communication with any scientific certainty over a period of 100,000 years.”
Best Guess
In the final disposal facility, the spent fuel assemblies will be encapsulated and placed in the bedrock at a depth of more than 450 meters (ft.). The facility comprises two parts: the aboveground encapsulation plant for the encapsulation of the spent fuel in the final disposal canisters, and the final repository deep in the bedrock, with tunnels in which the spent fuel will be placed. Swedish nuclear authorities are working with their Finnish counterparts on the R&D behind the project, and hope to construct their own version.
RSI looked at 100 cities before narrowing their choice down to Albuquerque. Miller cites cost of living and quality of life as other key factors driving the decision to select Albuquerque for RSI’s first facility outside of the Southeast.
According to Finnish legislation and regulations, the responsibility for waste management and decommissioning of nuclear power plants is with the waste generators themselves. In 1988, a fund was established for collecting nuclear waste management costs under the Nuclear Energy Act. Waste generators pay into this fund annually according to the fund target. “There is no set fee per kWh like in other countries,” says S&R. “Rather, the fund is being recalculated systematically every year based on the liability of waste producers.”
According to a fact sheet distributed in concert with the release of the total amount of high-level nuclear waste in the world, usually kept in water pools and casks near power plants, is between 250,000 and 300,000 tons and rising daily. Security standards around its handling and storage are guesses at best, as radiation was only first detected some 115 years ago. In Europe the security standard is 100,000 years for the minimum period the waste must be isolated from all living organisms. In the US it is 1 million years.
S&R became involved in the early stages of the project in the 1980s, providing expertise on site selection, rock engineering, layout-design and cost estimates for the project, and in the 2000s providing the expertise in long-term safety and production of the safety case for the construction license application.
“Nuclear new build countries and those still developing nuclear regulations stand to benefit hugely from following the Finnish example,” said O’Carroll of S&R. “Creating a national nuclear waste management program is a long-term commitment.”
Yes. Yes it is.
